Reasonable grounds for challenge….
By dismissing the notion of a case brought upon illegality as there are still questions about my arrest detention and interviewing what the learned judge has done is open the way for me to bring a private case against those concerned for discriminatory practices regardless of whether the information obtained was with or without the permission or knowledge of the individuals concerned and thus tape recordings of phone conversations and emails should be admissible. I would also site the use of recorded phone call conversations in the recent phone hacking scandal where such evidence was admissible to the court along with cases of national security especially around the terrorism cases. It is almost with automatic presumption that those representing any form of governmental authority are presumed correct from the outset but the reality of that is a social system that is still run and populated in this year of 2014 by individuals whom have it twisted about their roles and responsibilities for to work for the government is to sever the people and not the other way round. It is not appropriate that those whom serve in government seem to have no accountability not even in the most serious of case involving the deaths of children. In so many instances it comes down to one persons word against another and as such living in this day and age of social media and cctv awareness video phone accessibility video and audio recordings are part and parcel of our lives the killing of the solder in London became viral before the perpetrators we’re even charged. So if any means can be used to demonstrate that an individual within their social and political stances can be shown to be acting inconsistently with an ethos reflective of the social good why would the emphasis be upon rejection.